OpenAgile.com

the best

I really like Set One. I think it looks modern, bold, has nice clean lines, and is great. Others are good too, but Set one is my pick.

Mishkin here.

I prefer Alexei's logo by far. My own logo sucks :-) Chris' logo is great, but I fear it is too small and thin for the kinds of things that a logo should be used for.

The version that Alexei created is designed so that it can be used in single-color situations. He also explained to me that it is so bold because when it is used either in very small situations or very large situations, a bolder logo usually looks better. He was also very emphatic that the logo should _not_ attempt to convey too much of the nature of OpenAgile itself. He explained that this is not the purpose of a logo - rather the logo is an identifier that should focus on instant recognition, not subtle or complicated communication.

Mishkin.

I wonder if the triangle in Alexei's design could be about growth and capacity building. Wouldn't that be nice?

This is an addition from Chris Heidema that he emailed me.

Note: The actual badges started with designs from the three people... then were modified with a little colour and the words champion, readiness, and team member.

I like Alexei's design too. I think the "Readiness" element could be a little bigger (to occupy the same amount of space as "Champion" and "Team Member" proportional to the words OpenAgile).

And if you used the O or OA in the same font as Alexei used as the end slide in the training modules, I wouldn't think of Oprah Magazine so often :)

I like Alexie's design too.
Clean
Open
Creative

Good choice on complementary fonts and colours.

Missing capstone on 'A' - Bad (a long story).

Tony

Of the three, Alexei's design is by far the best.
Good:
- clarity
- simplicity
- least number of colors
- scalability
- would look great on a golf bag
Bad:
- screams software
- What's with the little triangle?

Feedback:
- It would be ideal for the look of the logo to tie into the Learning Circle, and vice versa